The relationship ranging from outcrossing distance and you may cumulative exercise wasn’t extreme (quadratic regression: F

The relationship ranging from outcrossing distance and you may cumulative exercise wasn’t extreme (quadratic regression: F

For a few tree kinds inside the Sri Lanka’s damp area woods, fresh fruit place increased significantly which have outcrossing point, peaking on intermediate-point within-forest crosses (1–ten kilometres according to varieties). Into the crosses anywhere between trees consuming separate tree supplies, however, fruits place are rather smaller (otherwise nearly therefore) for both variety. On the other hand, seed products germination and you will seedling top at the step one yr getting Sh. cordifolia advised hybrid energy in-between-forest crosses. The consequences out-of nearby-next-door neighbor mating ranged certainly one of trees and you can types; new imply fitness price of nearby-neighbor mating according to mating which have modestly more faraway natives was 45% to own S. rubicundum and 0% to have Sh. cordifolia. Conversely, new physical fitness negative effects of between-tree crossing had been good-sized both for variety (52 and you will 70% according to in this-forest crosses for the very same one or two kinds). Crossing effects decreased amongst the amounts away from good fresh fruit set and you will step one-yr-old seedling dimensions; only the former is significant for variety. Overall performance imply a robust prospect of biparental inbreeding depression within forest tree communities and limited reproductive separation certainly one of woods occupying the remainder forest reserves inside Sri Lanka’s wet region.

Inbreeding despair often is cited since the an inescapable results of anthropogenic disturbance in order to tropical forests (e.g., tree fragmentation, logging), where concept forecasts you to normal mating habits contained in this already lowest-density forest populations is shifted so you can prefer small-range crosses. Up until now, although not, the results regarding increased close-neighbor mating for inhabitants exercise into the exotic trees has actually yet , so you can become quantified empirically. A couple fundamental concerns to be addressed is actually: Do adults prevent maturing seed products derived from near-next-door neighbor crosses and you may, otherwise, just how complement is near-neighbor-derived progeny according to someone else? This research assesses the consequences out of near-neighbor mating in 2 warm tree species really thanks to fitness contrasting regarding crosses between nearby natives having crosses of way more faraway mates.

Shorea cordifolia (Dipterocarpaceae) is a locally abundant main canopy species you to herbs greatly from the irregular supra-annual menstruation (I. A good. You. N. Gunatilleke mais aussi al., unpublished study). Flowers from the types are white and you may quick-lived, plus the winged fruits is spreading of the piece of cake or the law of gravity. Because of its very minimal seed dispersal, hereditary relatedness certainly close neighbors into the pure forest is expected so you’re able to become large. In signed tree in the Sinharaja, Sh. cordifolia constantly takes place in clumps off ?5–20 grownups, intermixed with quicker stems (personal observance).

Investigation studies

For both species, within-treatment variation among maternal trees in fruit set was substantial for all outcrosses involving pollen donors within Sinharaja Reserve. In contrast, variation in fruit set rate was very low for between-forest crosses (Fig. 2). For Sh. cordifolia, fruit set for the distant between-forest treatment ranged from only 0.5 to 0.6% and was significantly lower than the mean fruit set rate for all within-forest outcrossing treatments combined (mean = 2.71%, F1,58 = 9.94, P < 0.0003). For S. rubicundum, mean fruit set for the distant between-forest treatment (2.67%) was low relative to mean fruit set rate for all within-forest outcrossing treatments combined (mean = 5.97%). The difference was nearly significant (Fstep 1,58 = 3.78, P < 0.06).

For Sh. cordifolia, cumulative fitness was maximum at both the distant neighbor and distant within-forest treatments (Fig. 5). Peak cumulative fitness observed for these intermediate crossing treatments was 2 and 4.3 times the cumulative fitnesses of the nearest-neighbor and distant between-forest treatments, respectively, although these differences were not significant (Table 3B). 2,8 = 3.70, P = 0.073). Mean cumulative fitness of open-pollinated flowers exceeded that of all other hand-pollination treatments, again likely due to the detrimental effect of the hand-pollination procedure on fruit set in this species. As for fruit set, mean cumulative fitness (relative) of the distant between-forest treatment (mean = 0.12) was significantly lower than that of all within-forest outcrossed classes combined (mean = 0.51, Fstep one,twelve = 8.77, P = 0.012).

Near-neighbors crossing impact

Near-neighbor crossing effects have been demonstrated for a number of coniferous species (Coles and Fowler, 1976; Park and Fowler, 1982, 1984; Latta et al., 1998), but only three studies have yielded evidence rencontres hindoues gratuites of near-neighbor crossing effects in woody angiosperms (Syzygium cormiflorum-Crome and Irvine, 1986; Schiedea spp.-Sakai, Karoly, and Weller, 1989; Eucalyptus globules-Hardner, Potts, and Gore, 1998). In another study suggestive of biparental inbreeding depression, mean fruit set rates were significantly lower for intraspecific crosses <0.5 km distance than for crosses >1 km distance for three subcanopy tree species (Inga spp.) in Costa Rica (Koptur, 1984). In fact, it may be that biparental inbreeding depression is common in natural populations of forest trees, but that estimation of its potential through experimental cross-pollinations has been limited to only a few species due to the obvious difficulty of working in the canopy. To my knowledge, there are no published reports of failed attempts to find near-neighbor crossing effects in natural populations of forest trees.

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.

.
.
.
.